What were the circumstances surrounding Stella Liebeck vs. McDonald's?

Study for the LEGL 2700 Hackleman 2 Exam. Enhance your skills with multiple choice questions, comprehensive explanations, and strategic study tips. Prepare for success!

In the case of Stella Liebeck vs. McDonald's, the correct circumstances involve her being injured while trying to add cream and sugar to her coffee. Liebeck, a 79-year-old woman, was a passenger in a parked car when she attempted to modify her coffee order. She placed the cup between her knees and, while removing the lid to add cream and sugar, accidentally spilled the extremely hot beverage on herself, suffering severe burns. This incident brought attention to the temperature at which the coffee was served, and it led to significant legal proceedings focusing on product liability and negligence.

The case sparked discussions about consumer safety, corporate responsibility, and the legal implications of serving excessively hot food and beverages. It also illustrated the potential consequences of injuries resulting from commonly used products, emphasizing that businesses must consider the safety of their items and how they are used by consumers.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy