What is the consequence of using a nolo contendere plea?

Study for the LEGL 2700 Hackleman 2 Exam. Enhance your skills with multiple choice questions, comprehensive explanations, and strategic study tips. Prepare for success!

A nolo contendere plea, also known as a "no contest" plea, has specific legal implications that differentiate it from a standard guilty plea. By entering a nolo contendere plea, the defendant essentially acknowledges that the prosecution has enough evidence for a conviction but does not admit guilt. One of the key consequences of this plea is that it cannot be used against the defendant in subsequent civil litigation related to the offense.

This means that if the case were to be followed by a civil suit—such as a lawsuit seeking damages related to the crime—the nolo contendere plea cannot be cited as an admission of liability in that civil court. This is particularly important for defendants who want to avoid the repercussions of such a plea impacting their civil rights and responsibilities.

While it is true that a nolo contendere plea may result in a conviction and associated penalties, it does not absolve the defendant from having a record of the offense, as that would not be the accurate understanding of such a plea's implications. Additionally, the plea does not equate to being guilty by default in the sense that the defendant has accepted guilt; rather, the plea indicates an unwillingness to contest the charges while protecting some legal perspectives in civil proceedings. Moreover, the ability to

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy