In what situation is a bailee not likely held reliable for damage to an object in bailment?

A bailee is typically held liable for damage to property in their care, depending on the level of negligence or duty owed to the property owner. However, in certain situations, they may not be held liable, such as in the case of an "Act of God."

An Act of God refers to natural events that are unforeseen and cannot be prevented, such as floods, earthquakes, or severe storms. When damage to the bailed property occurs solely because of such uncontrollable natural forces, the bailee typically cannot be held responsible. This is because the bailee had no control over these events and could not have reasonably anticipated or mitigated the risk of damage.

In contrast, negligence by the bailee or improper storage would likely place liability on the bailee for failing to exercise appropriate care. Intentional damage by a third party might also open the bailee to liability if they failed to take necessary precautions that could have prevented the damage. Thus, the scenario of an Act of God clearly aligns with the legal principles surrounding bailment, as it absolves the bailee from responsibility when damage is caused by forces beyond their control.